The Feast of Esther by Jan Lievens (ca. 1625). North Carolina Museum of Art.

The Book of Esther Between Judaism and Christianity

September 2025 | Vol. 13.9

By Isaac Kalimi

The Book of Esther tells a short but horrifying story about the threatened annihilation of the Jews in the Persian Empire, a near holocaust, which is averted only thanks to the rapid, courageous, and decisive actions of courtier Mordecai and Queen Esther. The catastrophe is turned upside-down, as the threat of annihilation is not merely cancelled, but instead inflicted on the enemies of the Jews, resulting in their suffering with the violence and death that they had intended against others. Set in the Elamite city of Susa, the book mixes reality, drama, humor, irony, and sarcasm to create a series of tragic-comic moments — all expressed in a fluid and beautiful style, sophisticated literary methods, and rich language — intended to attract the audience to the frightening and dramatic story that hides an important theological and social message.

Esther and Mordechai, by Aert de Gelder (ca. 1685). Public Domain, photo courtesy of RISD Museum.

Esther and Mordechai, by Aert de Gelder (ca. 1685). Public Domain, photo courtesy of RISD Museum.

The absence of religious institutions, rituals, and the explicit name of God (in any form) from the Hebrew version of the book, does not mean that the author has no interest in theological matters. He encapsulates and addresses the worst fear of the Israelite/Jewish people: the threat of complete annihilation and God’s reaction to it.

Through the ages, Esther has gained overall a great popularity and has long been (with a few exceptions) one of the most beloved biblical books across Jewish communities. The Talmudic rabbis rank it nearly as highly as the holiest scripture of Judaism — the Torah — and even before all the prophetic and other hagiographic books. Esther has received enormous attention among Jewish scholars, who have devoted a significant number of diverse studies, translations, and interpretations to the book. All these have inspired Jewish thoughts, legends and folklore, art (such as painting), music, plays and humoristic theater pieces, as well as prose and poetic literature in many languages in almost in all Jewish communities around the globe.

The Feast of Esther by Jan Lievens (ca. 1625). North Carolina Museum of Art.

The Feast of Esther by Jan Lievens (ca. 1625). North Carolina Museum of Art.

In antiquity, Esther’s story was translated into Greek, and six “Additions” were attached to it. Josephus Flavius dedicated an extensive section of his work to rewriting the story, and the book was probably included in his “canon” of twenty-two Jewish scriptures. A special tractate was dedicated to it not only in the Mishnah, but also in the Tosefta, the Jerusalem Talmud, and the Babylonian Talmud. Esther was the subject of several special homiletic collections (e.g., Midrash Esther Rabbah), and two Aramaic translations (Targum Rishon and Targum Sheni). The rabbis integrated it into their halachic system, midrashic methodologies of interpretation, and unique theologies. In the medieval period, different commentaries were written on the Megillah, both by the Rabbanite and Karaite exegetes, by Sephardi as well as Ashkenazi scholars.This trend has continued also up to modern times.

The book was also used by the Jews in their disputes with Christians. Jews have made connection between the story of Esther and their own situation in different lands. They have regularly associated their contemporary enemies with those whose anti-Jewish policies have been overcome within the book, seeing them all as repeated manifestations of the same anti-Jewish oppression shown by “Haman.” They considered Esther as a model for understanding their ongoing experiences of exile and have frequently anticipated salvation through the downfall of their opponents, while comparing them to Haman and other enemies as is told at the end of Esther. The story of the evil Haman was usually utilized to describe later Jews’ oppressors as “new Haman(s)” almost everywhere. Jews who have faced their own contemporary oppressors and foes have often looked to Esther for models to describe their own experiences. They have celebrated the day of release and deliverance from the hands of those enemies, and called it a “Second Purim,” while sending presents to each other and assisting the poor and weak members of society, writing the stories of their own “Hamans” and the great miracles of their time as “new Megillot” and reading them publicly.

This centrality of the book within Jewish reception history may be attributed to several factors. First and foremost is the central theological message of the book that implicitly emphasizes the eternal covenant between God and Israel in any place and time, and under any circumstances. Added to this is the relevance of the story for almost every generation — including ours — and in every place, illustrating the extraordinary existence of the Jewish people despite all the hostilities, evil plans, and acts of Jew-haters. The book of Esther has been paradigmatic for Jewish confrontations with threats throughout the ages, including both during and after the Holocaust.

Megillah: Scroll of the Book of Esther, copied and illustrated by Raphael Montalto, ca. 1686. Spencer Collection, New York Public Library. Public Domain.

Megillah: Scroll of the Book of Esther, copied and illustrated by Raphael Montalto, ca. 1686. Spencer Collection, New York Public Library. Public Domain.

There is a vital distinction to be made between the Christian “Book of Esther” and the Jewish “Megillat Esther”: Jews read the short version of Esther, the Hebrew text. In contrast, most Christians (particularly the Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches) read the long version of the book (originally in Greek or Latin), which contain the six major “Additions” and differ in many important variants from the Hebrew one. The latter refer also to God and several religious themes which do not appear in the Hebrew version. It is hard to imagine that the name of God was mentioned explicitly in the original Hebrew version and later someone simply deleted it. Strikingly, the Hebrew version of the book — that does not mention God’s name — is adored by Jews, while the Greek/Latin version — that does mention God’s name — is neglected by Christians.

The Christian reception of Esther most often was and still is widely negative and neglective.  At best Esther has a marginal place within Christian religion, theology, and culture which has tended to assess the book quite negatively; Esther is never referred to in the New Testament and is hardly cited by the Christian Church Fathers.  Early Christians hesitated for a long time whether to include the book in their scriptural canons or exclude it altogether. Even when the book finally became a part of the Christian canon, the dispute over it still continued for many generations, and some Christian thinkers and writers doubted its religious value and expressed sharp hostility towards it, while others simply ignored or dismissed it altogether. The first Christian commentary on the book was not written until the 9th century, by Rabanus Maurus of Mainz. Maurus presented Queen Esther positively, as a symbol of the Church, in contrast to queen Vashti (who was removed from her position), whom he identified with the Synagogue, which was rejected and replaced by the Church. Aside from Maurus’ commentary, Esther received very little — if any — attention until the Reformation, when it was referred to in the works of Martin Luther (1483-1546).

Illustration depicting Rabanus Maurus (left), as he dedicates his work to the Archbishop of Mainz. From De laudibus sanctae crucis, by Rabanus Maurus (780-856). Wein, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, cod.652, fol. 2v (Fulda, 2nd quarter of the 9th century)

Illustration depicting Rabanus Maurus (left), as he dedicates his work to the Archbishop of Mainz. From De laudibus sanctae crucis, by Rabanus Maurus (780-856). Wein, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, cod.652, fol. 2v (Fulda, 2nd quarter of the 9th century)

In the last four decades of his life, Martin Luther’s approach towards the Jews as a people shifted, from tolerant and welcoming (for missionary purposes) in the early stages to sweeping xenophobic and antisemitic later on. Likewise, his views of Esther also shifted: Luther praises especially Queen Esther (but also Mordecai) mostly in the early stage of his career, while his harshest statements about the book of Esther appear particularly in his late writings, where he uses the book to accuse the Jews of being cruel murderers and bloodthirsty enemies of the Christians. These two themes run alongside each other in Luther’s life as a reformer: His sympathy especially towards Esther the person as a model of piety,and his hostility towards Esther the book (along with 2 Maccabees) is part of and runs parallel to his early “friendly” and later anti-Jewish polemics.

Martin Luther (1483-1546). Painting from the workshop of Lucas Cranach the Elder, probably 1532. Metropolitan Museum of Art. Public Domain.

Martin Luther (1483-1546). Painting from the workshop of Lucas Cranach the Elder, probably 1532. Metropolitan Museum of Art. Public Domain.

Luther claimed that the book of Esther shows “too much Jewishness and contains a lot of pagan impropriety.” According to him, the book reflects a vengeful and bloodthirsty spirit. Though Luther translated the book into German in his complete translation of the Christian Bible, he declares that it is too popular among the Jews to be adopted and appreciated by Christians. His failure to convert the Jews seems to have deepened his hatred towards them and their triumphs over Haman and over Antiochus IV. His abhorrence of the Purim feast and its celebration of the Jews’ rescue from extermination is all tied in with a broader antipathy towards the continued existence of Jews and Judaism, which he neither tolerated nor recognized as a legitimate religion with its own worth.

Luther’s harsh criticism of the book of Esther and his aggressive and destructive assertions concerning the Jews and their faith had an enormous effect on generations of theologians, writers, thinkers, and politicians, particularly in the Protestant Christian world, but not only there. It led to widespread misinterpretation and misrepresentations of the book, with claims that it celebrates revenge and mass-murder, using it to demonize the Jews as the enemies of God and mankind. Esther’s ethical and moral norms have been claimed to be far below those of any other biblical books, particularly those of the Gospels. It has been considered not to be a religious book, one that is unworthy of Christian study and theology. Many Christian theologians, commentators and scholars have condemned the book and used it as a platform to express their own bias, Judeophobic or antisemitic agendas, and propagate their prejudice and hatred towards the Jews and their cultural and religious heritage — Judaism.

Of course, it is not necessarily illegitimate to criticize a biblical text, nor must a critique necessarily be seen anti-Jewish or antisemitic. Esther’s story is not protected from critique more than any other biblical or other text should be, and many Jews and Christians have wrestled with the historical, theological, ethical, and other questions raised by the book. Esther is no more ethically problematical than some other biblical texts/books, and even if it were, that would not justify condemning the entire Jewish people along with it. While there is no justification of brutality for its own sake,  too many Christian exegetes have overstated the violence in the Esther story and drawn from it and loaded on it antisemitic conclusions. A close analysis of its context and main theme, its textual variants, its genre, and the common ancient literary conventions that stand behind it would exclude such condemnations of the book and the Jews. The Esther story does not celebrate violence; it stresses self-defense and the deliverance of the Jews from freighting annihilation in the face of brutal Jew-haters. Just a handful of Christian scholars — before, during and some decades after the Shoah — have called for a positive evaluation of the book of Esther. Some of them even stress that Christians should learn from the book of Esther that God protects Israel and punishes those who try to persecute it. Nevertheless, while there have been some positive Christian evaluations of the book, the list of those damning the work in antisemitic terms is depressingly long.

Book Cover for the Book of Esther between Judaism and Christianity, written by Isaac Kalimi and published by Cambridge University Press

The Book of Esther Between Judaism and Christianity presents the book of Esther within its own merits, context, and complexity. It shows its literary features and virtuosity; historical background and the extent of its historical plausibility; and its key theological position, as well as its various difficulties. Furthermore, it discusses the place of the book and its figures in the sister monotheistic religions and cultures of Judaism and Christianity. It demonstrates how and why different Jewish denominations have approached the book, and how its story and characters have been used throughout the centuries as models for their own reality and destiny. It is my hope that readers come away from the book not only with a better understanding of this unique biblical book and its reception history in Judaism and Christianity, but also with better understanding of Jewish-Christian relationship.

Isaac Kalimi  is Gutenberg Research Professor (emeritus) at the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz (Germany), Senior Research Fellow at the University of Chicago (USA), an ordinary member of Academia Europaea, and an honorary member of Belgian Royal Academy for Overseas Sciences. He is the author of many books, including Fighting Over the Bible (Brill, 2017); Writing and Rewriting the Story of Solomon in Ancient Israel (Cambridge, 2018); The Book of Esther between Judaism and Christianity (Cambridge, 2023); and Martin Luther, Jews, and Judaism (Routledge, 2025).

How to cite this article:

Kalimi, I. 2025. “The Book of Esther Between Judaism and Christianity”, The Ancient Near East Today 13.9. Accessed at: https://anetoday.org/book-of-esther/.

Want to learn more?

3 Comments

  • Al Kidd

    The article’s author was careful to acquaint readers with the different responses that the book of Esther elicited among major faith communities since antiquity. That is education.

  • professor peter long

    a most helpful summary of all the issues surrounding esther.

  • アイム ノット ヒューマン

    This piece offers a fascinating, if slightly exhausting, tour of Esthers complex journey between Jewish affection and Christian ambivalence. Its particularly amusing to witness the theological gymnastics involved in explaining why the Jewish people adore a book about themselves without Gods explicit name, while Christians generally overlook one that mentions Him. The Luther section is a standout, showing how even a reformers changing views on Jews could lead to some rather dramatic, and antisemitic, interpretations of Esther. Its a reminder that reading scripture is often more about the reader than the text itself. Still, its heartening to see even a few positive evaluations emerge, proving that sometimes, even in the world of religious interpretation, common sense and mutual respect can occasionally win out over centuries of tradition and suspicion.アイム ノット ヒューマン

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *